Last week’s CASRO Online Research event in Las Vegas included what is sure to be one of the most memorable industry conference sessions for quite some time. Toluna’s John Bremer moderated a panel discussion with actual MR panelists who shared their motivations, frustrations and expectations about participating in online research panels. The panelists were exceedingly candid; they revealed what keeps them engaged (naturally, financial incentives work best) and what causes significant frustration (a big complaint is regularly being invited to surveys for which they don’t actually qualify). Some admitted to belonging to the same panel under multiple accounts, to taking the same survey more than once – and even to generating enough incentives to pay the rent. While few of the panelists’ revelations were surprising, it was novel to hear this information straight from the mouths of respondents.
Market researchers are already aware that competition for panelists is at an all-time high and panel attrition is a serious issue. We all know that the MR industry needs to ensure we are providing a satisfactory experience to respondents; not only because it affects engagement, but also because it influences data quality. Yet poor questionnaire design and usability errors continue to be serious problems. Inadequate querying practices too often result in unrepresentative samples and the over-sending of survey invitations. Ineffective de-duplication processes permit individuals to complete the same survey multiple times. Our industry is well aware of these issues, and the panel of panelists at CASRO Online readily reinforced the message.
So what’s the answer? Utilization of effective survey software and panel management software goes a long way toward solving these problems. Today’s sophisticated survey and panel solutions provide tools – both automated and customizable – that enhance panel performance and keep respondents happy and engaged. In situations where outside sample and/or multiple sample sources are utilized, respondent authentication solutions such as TrueSample® are also beneficial to verify, de-dup and monitor survey participants. Kinesis proudly integrates to TrueSample, and readily provides many additional next-generation features (multimode community websites, advanced email delivery tools, panel health assessments, and more) to empower our clients and facilitate successful market research panels.

Recently our president Leslie Townsend presented sessions focusing on mobile market research at both the CASRO Technology and MRA Annual conferences. Each session had time for Q&A at the end, and the CASRO presentation produced a very interesting question on the topic of “jailbreaking.” The attendee was curious as to how the market research industry should best support mobile respondents who have jailbroken smartphones.
Sean Conry of Techneos Systems and Patricia Graham of Knowledge Networks presented a case study about the principle considerations of implementing mobile research, and provided detailed results of their case study project and its business implications. The NPD Group’s Inna Burdein looked at how panelist reporting habits change as they become tenured, and how research results are affected. Melanie Courtwright and Chuck Miller from DMS Insights compared four of the most commonly used respondent validation programs to understand the validation metrics used by each and the resulting validation rates provided. These, and many other sessions, were truly insightful and had a lot of “action” included within their conversation.